When navigating the complexities of child support, one crucial decision is how payments will be made. Do you opt for the official State Payment Center or choose the more personal route of Direct Payments? Both methods have unique pros and cons, and your state's laws will significantly influence your choice.
Here's a breakdown, focusing on the rules in Kansas and Missouri, and the overall benefits and risks of choosing direct payments.
State-Specific Rules: Kansas vs. Missouri
The default for child support in most states is using a centralized system for tracking and distributing funds. However, exceptions exist:
Kansas: The Payment Center is the Default
In Kansas, the standard practice is for all child support to flow through the Kansas Payment Center. To bypass this system and make direct payments, parents must demonstrate “good cause.”
- How to Qualify: A written agreement between both parents stating they will make and accept direct payments usually satisfies the "good cause" requirement.
- Proof is Required: Even with direct payments, the court still needs proof. The paying parent is legally required to submit an annual "payment accounting" to the court to verify compliance.
Missouri: More Flexibility
Missouri offers more options. Parents can choose to use the Missouri Family Support Payment Center or can opt for direct payments.
- "Good Cause" Applies: Similar to Kansas, Missouri courts look for "good cause" to approve direct payments, particularly when there is an income withholding order against the paying parent.
- Record-Keeping is Key: If you choose direct payments, you must keep detailed records. Should a dispute arise, these records (such as bank receipts or statements) will need to be presented to the court.
The Allure of Direct Payments
For some families, direct payments seem like an easier, more flexible option.
- Flexibility & Cooperation: Direct payments can work exceptionally well for parents who share a cooperative co-parenting relationship. This method may allow for more mutual leniency regarding payment timing or minor adjustments, fostering a less rigid financial dynamic.
The Risks: Why State Systems Exist
While flexibility is nice, direct payments carry significant risks that the state payment centers are designed to mitigate:
1. Record-Keeping is Your Burden
The biggest downside is the strict record-keeping responsibility placed on the paying parent.
- Kansas Annual Accounting: You must prepare and file an annual financial accounting with the court, which takes time and meticulous effort.
- Missouri Proof: You must keep detailed receipts and records that can be presented to a judge instantly if a disagreement occurs. A missing record is often treated as a missing payment.
2. Increased Conflict
Mixing money and co-parenting can be a recipe for strain.
- New Disputes: Direct payments can be a source of new disagreements if parents don't agree on the exact amount, timing, or method of a payment, potentially straining the crucial co-parenting relationship.
- Distraction from Kids: Constant financial discussions can distract from building a healthy, functional co-parenting team, which should always prioritize the child's well-being.
3. Enforcement Complications
State payment centers streamline enforcement, but direct payments can complicate it, especially with relocation.
- Moving Out of State: If one or both parents move out of Kansas or Missouri, the enforcement of the child support order can become complex. Courts retain jurisdiction until the order is officially transferred to the new state. Failure to properly transfer the order could create payment enforcement issues and significant legal complications.

The Final Takeaway
Direct payments can be a practical and trusting option for parents with an exceptionally strong, cooperative relationship. They require consistent communication, meticulous record-keeping, and mutual respect.
However, if your relationship is rocky, trust is low, or you just want financial matters to be as simple and verifiable as possible, the State Payment Center offers an official, third-party ledger that minimizes conflict and simplifies enforcement.
Always consult with an experienced family law attorney to fully understand your state's requirements and ensure your chosen method complies with the law to avoid future legal headaches.

Member discussion